Some students consider chivalry is dead, and rightfully so. Says Gong, “I don’t think people should just stick with traditions.”Īsks Kenny, “What’s the rule that makes the guy ask?” While chivalry may not have the grand importance it once held, there is reasoning behind these changes. But these old things shouldn’t die because of equality.”īesides just paying, Ruttenburg believes that tradition is important in deciding who asks whom to a dance. Junior Kevin Ruttenburg says, “If the girl asks a guy, then she can pay. Still, other students believe that traditions hold value.
But in college, split the bill.” The reasoning here makes sense: for students saving money to pay for an education, sharing the cost of dining or other expenses seems like a good idea. If you’re grown and working, the man should pay. Senior Shorwei Gong also believes the default spender shouldn’t necessarily be the man. Says Kenny, “Why should it matter ? Whoever asked the other person on the date should pay.” Is it really the end of the world if a couple splits the cost of a meal?Īccording to senior Connor Kenny, not at all. But as gender roles have started shifting, some of these views have also begun to change. The boy was supposed to give up his seat on a bus, always ask the girl out to dances, or pay for every date. As Das says, old chivalrous expectations tended to go beyond those expected of modern polite society, as men were supposed to go above and beyond simply treating women with respect. Over time, it changed to refer to guidelines of how men should treat women. Originally, chivalry was the medieval knight’s code of honor and conduct. The word expects people to do a little bit more, like pulling a chair out for someone to sit down in,” explains senior Priyam Das.
“I still see instances of, like holding the door open.
0 kommentar(er)
